Sweating the Small Stuff in 50-50 Business Partnerships

During the Valentine’s Day season, let’s take a hard look at the allure and pitfalls of owning 50-50 private businesses with your best buddy or sibling. It might seem peachy on paper since you’re both intimately invested, equally controlling, and anticipating the same returns. Yet, just like any romantic partnership, a business venture can run into unresolvable spats, potentially leading to a costly business divorce. Yep, here’s the biggie: when conflicts arise, you’re smack dab in a deadlock that could not only distract you but also shipwreck your business.

The Deadlock Dilemma Is a Real New York Nightmare

We’ve got a face full of reality here, folks. The threat of a co-owned business capsizing due to unresolved owner disputes is serious. Consider these trainwrecks: the legendary Buffalo law firm Cellino & Barnes, which disbanded in 2020 after a headline-grabbing, three-year legal marathon that ended in a court-ordered buyout. Or the co-CEOs of TransPerfect Global, Inc., who finally settled their epic six-year tug of war in 2020.

Each of these cautionary tales highlights why partners need to think twice about equal ownership and contemplate whether it’s the best fit. If this is really the street they want to walk, there are definitely some options to avert bleeding heart outcomes.

Rethinking the Balance: Financial Harmony, Varying Control

Not sold on 50-50? Consider changing the ownership structure while keeping financial equality. Opt for a 51%-49% split but ensure profits and compensation are even. This setup lets both partners share financial outcomes while smoothing decision-making processes to banish gridlocks.

In this plan, the majority owner calls day-to-day shots, but the minority gets veto power on critical decisions through negotiation. Think admissions of new partners, selling the business, or taking on significant debts—these could require unanimous agreement. It’s a tango of negotiating veto rights without tripping over each other’s toes.

Craft Crystal-Clear Tie Breakers

If you still fancy keeping everything equal, you better lay down some solid tie-breaking rules to prevent future deadlock. Consider these tidbits below.

Distinct Roles with Decisive Authority

If two partners have distinct roles, let each make unrivaled decisions in their own sphere. For instance, the marketing hotshot could decide on ad strategies, while the one managing the books picks the accounting software. However, partners might still hit bumps on whether to tweak budget allocations or growth plans. Here’s the thin ice: lurking common grounds where deadlocks can sprout.

Designate a Neutral Tiebreaking Authority

Appoint one person or a small board versed in the industry to arbitrate disputes. It sounds logical but agreeing on this person or board might become another bone of contention. Those selected might also shy away from this cozy setup knowing they have to nudge one partner’s views over another. Of course, indemnifying these decision-makers and settling their legal bills is, well, part of this messy package.

Roll Out an Arbitration Procedure

For intricate disputes, take them to arbitration on a fast track. This formal method uses a private arbitration service, offering final, non-appealable results in 60-90 days. Before launching into arbitration, partners should mandatory engage in face-to-face mediation to hammer out solutions before legal gauntlets come off.

Strike a Negotiated Buy-Sell Agreement

Even with mediators or boards, unresolved discord could persist, making a buy-sell agreement indispensable. If tensions simmer and one partner feels sidelined, guaranteed exit strategies become life-savers, keeping disgruntled partners from wreaking havoc to force a buyout.

Your buy-sell pact should answer: who kicks off the buyout, how is it logged, and how do you value a partner’s interest on exit? Outline payment terms, interest rates, and collateral. And, crucially, lay down a dispute resolution plan for any skirmishes over the agreement’s interpretation.

The Notorious "Shotgun" Clause

The “shotgun” clause is a move investors often discuss. One partner makes a buy offer, the other chooses to sell or counter-offer. This nuanced dance needs careful deliberation, so both parties can meet their business goals when the trigger is pulled.

Final Thoughts

Jumping into a 50-50 business is exhilarating but dangerous. It clings to the hope of long-term collaboration. When disputes bubble up, deadlocks can cripple the business—decisions postponed and lost opportunities. The stalemate also negatively impacts employees and customers.

If deadelned risks are accepted, partners should remain vigilant in conflict prevention. Implement tie-breaking steps and clinch a buy-sell agreement for any point of irreconcilable differences. For partners wanting to maintain a happy business affair well after Cupid’s holiday, these tactical moves lay a sturdy foundation for long-term success and provide an exit for a tidy business breakup.

Hoping to keep the business love alive beyond that romantic February glow, these plans give partners a shot at professional harmony and, if necessary, an amicable exit later on.

Listen to this post.